top of page
futureofromania

Insight of the Day: Why Young People in Romania No Longer Want to Go to College and What This Means in the Long Term?

Detailed Summary: The article highlights an alarmingly low percentage of young Romanians (22% between 25 and 29 years old) completing higher education, placing Romania last in the EU, well below the European average of 42%. It compares the situation with other countries, including non-EU ones, highlighting significant gaps. Causes mentioned include high education costs, poor funding of universities, the perception that college does not guarantee a good job, and the migration of talented young people abroad. The long-term negative impact on the competitiveness of the Romanian economy is also discussed.

Key Takeaway: Romania faces a serious problem regarding higher education, with major negative implications for the country's economic and social future.

Trend: The decreasing number of young Romanians choosing to pursue university studies.

Consumer (Young Person's) Motivation:

  • Perception of Low Return on Investment: Young people believe that investing in higher education does not necessarily translate into a well-paid job or real opportunities.

  • High Costs: Tuition fees, living costs in university centers, and lack of financial support are major obstacles.

  • Alternative Opportunities: Young people may be attracted to other opportunities, such as direct employment after high school or vocational training in in-demand fields.

  • Migration: Better study and career opportunities abroad.

What is Driving the Trend:

  • Inefficient Education System: A curriculum not adapted to labor market demands and a weak link between universities and the business environment.

  • Insufficient Funding for Universities: Limited resources for research, infrastructure, and student support programs.

  • Economic Crisis and Labor Market Uncertainty: General economic difficulties and the prospect of low wages, even with higher education.

Motivation Beyond the Trend: The search for a decent living and a secure future, regardless of whether it involves higher education.

Who the Article is Referring To: Young Romanians of Generation Z (roughly those born between 1997 and 2012), with emphasis on those aged 25-29.

Description of Consumers/Product/Service and Age: The consumers are young Romanians making decisions about their post-high school education. The "product/service" is university education in Romania. The main reference age is 25-29, but the analysis also extends to young people about to enter university.

Conclusions: Romania faces an alarming decline in the number of higher education graduates, with long-term negative consequences for the economy and society.

Implications for Brands:

  • Brands in the Educational Field: Must adapt their offerings to labor market demands, offer attractive programs, and demonstrate the added value of higher education.

  • Other Brands: Can contribute through internship programs, scholarships, and partnerships with universities, thus supporting young people and contributing to human capital development.

Implications for Society: A decrease in the number of higher education graduates can lead to a less skilled workforce, a less competitive economy, and a slowdown in social development.

Implications for Consumers (Young People): May experience difficulties in finding well-paid jobs and may have limited opportunities for personal and professional development.

Implications for the Future: Romania risks falling behind in global competition, having a less qualified workforce and a reduced capacity for innovation.

Consumer Trend: Young people's reorientation towards alternatives to traditional university studies.

Consumer Sub-Trend: The search for rapid vocational training, online courses, or entrepreneurship.

Major Social Trend: The changing perception of the value of formal education and the emphasis on practical skills and experience.

Local Trend: The declining trust in the Romanian education system.

Worldwide Social Trend: The emphasis on lifelong learning and adaptation to a constantly changing labor market.

Name of the Big Trend Implied by Article: The relative devaluation of traditional higher education in the current socio-economic context.

Name of the Big Social Trend Implied by Article: The reconfiguration of the role of education in society and the emphasis on practical skills.

Social Drive: The desire to quickly achieve financial independence and have a secure future.

Learnings for Companies in 2025: Companies must adapt to this new reality, invest in vocational training programs, and recognize the value of practical skills, not just diplomas.

Strategic Recommendations for Companies in 2025:

  • Partnerships with vocational and technical education institutions.

  • Internship and apprenticeship programs.

  • Investments in continuous employee training.

  • Recognition and utilization of non-formal skills.

Final Sentence (Key Concept): The relative devaluation of traditional higher education and the emphasis on practical skills and experience demonstrate that, in 2025, companies must adapt their recruitment and training strategies, investing in partnerships with vocational institutions and offering practical development opportunities to attract and retain young talent.

Comentários


Post: Blog2_Post
    bottom of page